Santanchè, the vote on the motion of no confidence in the Chamber
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d583e/d583ef6ca43190550a470f686afdd2d0bb03c044" alt="Santanchè, the vote on the motion of no confidence in the Chamber"
Daniela Santanchè will speak today in the Chamber where a vote is scheduled on the motion of no confidence presented by the 5 Star Movement and also signed by the PD and Avs. Indicted for false accounting in the Visibilia case and accused of fraud against INPS , the Minister of Tourism will also defend herself in the chamber as she has done so far, surviving the doubts raised by her own majority.
Santanchè, the bigwigs of the majority will not speak in the chamber
No party bigwigs. Today, in the vote declaration, the members of the Justice Commission will speak out for the majority. Here is the line decided by the majority. “A principle must be defended,” this is the gist of the reasoning: “Santanchè should not be defended on the merits of the accusations, also because the 5Stelle do not accuse the minister on the merits of her work at the ministry, but start from the assumption that the investigation is equal to resignation.”
Fratoianni (Avs): “Santanchè and Nordio should have left a long time ago”
"I don't know what Minister Santanchè and this embarrassing majority will do, which continues to protect those who should have left their institutional office for a long time out of dignity and respect for the institutions". This is what Nicola Fratoianni of Avs declared while speaking to reporters as he entered Montecitorio. "In short, there are some things that - continues the leader of SI - should suggest appropriate behavior and actions, but which I think are unknown on the right. This applies to Santanchè, it applies to Delmastro and they should also apply to Nordio, who showed up in Parliament and told a blatantly unfounded story and admitted, almost claiming, to have violated the rules", he adds. "But what else has to happen - concludes Fratoianni - for a minister, a minister, an undersecretary, not to cancel themselves from political life, but to stop holding institutional positions, in compliance with the constitutional rules that speak of discipline and honor in their performance?"
repubblica