UN Security Council positions itself in favor of Putin – General Assembly against
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7be7/b7be773aa30043d1fab9b09743540dc184b23dcc" alt="UN Security Council positions itself in favor of Putin – General Assembly against"
For the first time, the UN Security Council passed a resolution on the war in Ukraine by a majority - without naming Russia as the aggressor. The UN General Assembly, however, took a contrary position.
On the third anniversary of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the UN Security Council voted for a Moscow-friendly Ukraine resolution by the US government of President Donald Trump - with the votes of Russia. This was the first time that the most powerful UN body had made a joint decision on the war. In the Council, the text, which does not name Russia as the aggressor, received 10 votes from the 15 Council members and thus the required majority. Resolutions in the UN Security Council are binding under international law.
In the dispute over the future course of action on Ukraine, the USA voted together with Russia and China, among others. In contrast, all five European countries in the Council abstained - currently, these are Great Britain, France, Slovenia, Denmark and Greece. The British and French theoretically have a right of veto, but have not used it since 1989. They did not use it this time either. French President Emmanuel Macron was with US President Donald Trump at the White House in Washington during the Security Council meeting in New York; British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected there on Thursday.
The adopted paper entitled “The Road to Peace” does not name Moscow as the aggressor in the war, nor does it call for a Russian withdrawal; it simply calls for a rapid end to the war.
British UN Ambassador Barbara Woodward spoke out clearly against the resolution: "There can be no equation between Russia and Ukraine when this body discusses this war." Moscow is to blame for a war of aggression against a sovereign state that has cost hundreds of thousands of lives. France's Ambassador Nicolas de Rivière declared: "There will be no peace and security anywhere if aggression is rewarded."
The acting US ambassador, Dorothy Shea, said that the world was "on the brink of history" and that peace was needed as quickly as possible. She also wanted to reassure the Europeans: "We listen to our European colleagues when they say that they want a lasting peace, but not at any price," she said. They wanted to assure them that the USA also wanted a "lasting peace". The resolution was not a peace agreement and did not entail any costs.
UN initiative in UN General Assembly unsuccessfulThe USA had previously tried to use an identical draft resolution in the UN General Assembly in New York to gain global approval for Trump's change of course in the Ukraine war. The United Nations' largest body prevented this pro-Kremlin move. Several amendments from EU states, Ukraine and Great Britain received the necessary majorities, so that the US text subsequently clearly named Russia as the aggressor and reinterpreted it in a Ukrainian sense at key points.
Washington abstained from voting on its own resolution, as did China, while Russia voted against it with seven states. 93 countries, including Germany and most Europeans, voted in favor - a significantly lower level of support for Kyiv than in similar resolutions before.
The second resolution, drafted by Ukraine itself together with the EU delegation, also saw many abstentions, which is seen as a distancing from the US-European dispute over the course of Ukraine. At the UN, this also revealed a diplomatic transatlantic divide, with Hungary in particular breaking away from the EU side and siding with Washington.
Before the anniversary of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Trump's Ukraine initiative had led to diplomatic turbulence. Observers saw the move as a diplomatic rapprochement with Kremlin chief Vladimir Putin and increasing pressure on Kiev to enter into an agreement against its own will.
Die welt