World in disarray: Geopolitical tensions and rising military spending mark 2025

The world is going through a period of significant geopolitical disorder in May 2025, a situation marked by the confluence of multiple significant armed conflicts and palpable shifts in the global balance of power. Analysts warn of the dangers inherent in this era, with active wars in key regions demanding constant strategic adaptation by all.
the nations.
Within this complex landscape, the United States' domestic policies under the Trump administration are generating shock waves that transcend its borders. Decisions such as the confrontation with academic institutions like Harvard, addressing real problems like antisemitism and political intolerance but with controversial methods, illustrate this dynamic. Critics argue that "storming the academy" is a tactic that rarely works and could, in fact, backfire by victimizing the
most problematic actors.
This phenomenon, where the way a problem is addressed can be as crucial as the problem itself, underscores how divisive approaches can undermine initial objectives and have unexpected international ramifications. The perception of these actions abroad can affect relations.
diplomatic and the image of the country.
A tangible reflection of the growing concern about global security is the proposed significant increase in the US defense budget for fiscal year 2025. With Republican control of Congress, progress is being made toward adding $150 billion to the base budget of $886 billion, seeking to reach the trillion-dollar mark, a figure similar to that of the United States.
requested by President Trump.
This 17% increase, which even has some Democratic support, signals bipartisan concern about military capabilities.
Americans in the face of perceived threats on the world stage.
"With three or even four significant wars underway, who can doubt the dangers of this period?" – Timothy Garton Ash
The convergence of regional conflicts, increased military spending by powers like the U.S., and the implementation of disruptive domestic policies (such as tariffs or cultural confrontations) suggest a possible feedback loop. The perception of global instability seems to justify more assertive or even aggressive domestic and foreign policies. In turn, these policies can be interpreted as destabilizing by other international actors, exacerbating existing tensions and perpetuating a
cycle of distrust and military preparation.
The international community is closely watching these dynamics unfold, aware that decisions made in Washington have the potential to significantly shape the trajectory of global politics and security in the coming years. Domestic policy management, diplomacy, and defense strategy are inextricably intertwined in
this complex world board.
La Verdad Yucatán