FROM THE TC GAZİANTEP 13TH FAMILY COURT

DEFENDANT : BAYRAM KISA Yukarı Dikmen Mah. 641 Sk No: 26 Çankaya / ANKARA The plaintiff summarized his lawsuit petition as follows; She got married to the defendant on 13/08/2011, they have two children together from this marriage, the defendant constantly subjected her to psychological and physical violence, used drugs, was in prison for 6 years for this reason, he cheated on her after he was released from prison, they have been living separately for 9 months, for all these reasons she requested and sued for a divorce from the defendant, and for the alimony of 6,000 TL to be taken from the defendant and given to her, out of a monthly allowance of 3,000 TL for each of the children. In the divorce case conducted with file number 2025/228 of the Gaziantep 13th Family Court, the defendant is Bayram Kısa (TC: 26221491366), born on 05/04/1987 in Çankırı / Kızılırmak, son of Güleser and Mehmet. The notifications sent to Bayram Kısa were returned as not served and since the address information of the defendant could not be found despite the address searches, it was decided that the petition and the matters in the preliminary proceedings record be publicly notified to the defendant.

The petition shall be deemed to have been served seven days after the date of announcement, in accordance with Article 31 of the Notification Law. According to Article 122 of the Civil Procedure Code, the defendant may respond within two weeks from the date of announcement of the petition; if the response petition is not submitted within this period, they shall be deemed to have denied all of the facts in the petition, in accordance with Article 128 of the Civil Procedure Code; according to Articles 121 and 129 of the Civil Procedure Code, they must attach the documents they present as evidence to their petition and make the necessary explanations regarding documents to be brought from elsewhere; they must concretize the facts they rely on in a way that is suitable for proof; they are required to clearly state the evidence they rely on and which evidence is presented to prove which fact (Article 194); they cannot later put forward facts they did not specify in the response petition and the second response petition, or evidence they did not rely on; according to Law No. 7251, In accordance with article 141 of the Civil Procedure Code numbered 6100, as amended by the Civil Procedure Code, the parties can freely expand or change their claims and defenses with a response petition and a second response petition, and after the mutual submission of petitions, the matters that they cannot expand or change their claims and defenses, without prejudice to the provisions of amendment and the explicit consent of the other party in accordance with article 141/2 of the Civil Procedure Code, are notified to the defendant BAYRAM KISA BY ANNOUNCEMENT in lieu of notification.